Shaker Consulting Group Logo Virtual Job Tryout Logo

Author Archive

May 20, 2013

Why Recruiters Make It Tough to Get A Job

John Sullivan wrote an interesting article on why it is tough to get a job for ERE. He presents issues of candidate flow and recruiter behaviors, and supports many of his assertions with data from various surveys.

He pulled together some of the interesting facts about recruiter behavior. For additional detail, readers can go to the Candidate Experience Award and down load the 2012 white paper. While there, consider participating in the 2013 survey process.

John reinforces the fact that the vast majority of recruiter effort is candidate rejection. So it begs the question? What is your rejection process? (Here is a string or articles and video interviews on improving your rejection process.) The Candidate Experience Award winners have exceptional communication methods built into their process. In fact, one brand conscious organization knows that each candidate may already be, or could be a customer. They have a Brand Manifesto which mandates each candidate be personally dispositioned. Think about that level of commitment to your candidate experience.

While not a element of this particular company’s employment application process, many companies are adding a layer of candidate evaluation that requires more effort than submitting a resume. Treating candidates as decision makers and providing an interactive, educational and evaluation-based application reduces resume spam, gathers more useful information and supports better hiring outcomes. Better data = Better decisions for both the candidate and the recruiter. Well designed pre-employment assessment does just that.

Evidence-based hiring methods often document that previous experience is not the best predictor of success on the job. As such, the six second ‘wonder-look’ may indeed be placing emphasis on the wrong data. This is reinforced by John’s point that between 30 and 50 percent of hiring decisions are determined a failure. What other business process is allowed to operate with such a high level of staffing waste and rework?

John suggests it is time for a more scientific approach, and offers the candidate a few suggestions. There are sound alternatives for recruiters as well. Perhaps it is time for a shift from the hope-filled key word search to the research-filled capabilities evaluation. Companies that use HR analytics and evidence-based management for staffing process improvement achieve higher success rates. Learn more about this discipline here.

April 23, 2013

Joseph P. Murphy on Drive Thru HR – Small Side of Big Data

Bryan Wempen of DriveThruHR and I spoke about the Small Side of Big Data during this episode.

Listen to internet radio with DriveThru HR on Blog Talk Radio

A few points that got called out:
There are several places where each company can look at the small side of big data.  Each company has internal data that be used for HR Analytics to drive staffing process improvement.

  1. High population jobs – the 2 or 3 jobs with the most incumbents – the sheer numbers might suggest some opportunity for process improvement
  2. Jobs with the highest 90 day turnover – huge opportunity to reduce staffing waste and rework
  3. Jobs with objective performance metrics – opportunity to raise new hire performance consistency, reduce variation

The Three O’s of Quality of Hire:
Opinions - Does the hiring manager like the new associate?
Observations - Does the hiring manager rate new hire performance above average on behaviorally anchored rating scales?
Objective Metrics – Does the new hire achieve above average results on Dashboard Metrics, KPIs, production, outputs, etc.

A more useful alternative to Cost Per Hire is Cost to Proficiency.

Tweets during the broadcast mentioned
Benchmarking can be a “Me Too” strategy
Benchmarking prevents holding up the mirror
Recruiting is more about rejection

In addition, listeners were invited to consider and apply for the Candidate Experience Award

Listeners were also offered a free book – Practical Rigor; Evidence-based management to improvement hiring in high population jobs.

For your free copy go to our contact me page and type in BOOK or Practical Rigor in the notes form. An ebook version will be sent your way. A paper copy can be mailed to you, just ask.

Enjoy, and thanks for listening

April 8, 2013

Marc Wenzel, Ph.D. Joins Leadership Team at Shaker Consulting Group

We are pleased to announce that  Marc Wenzel, Ph.D. has joined our leadership team, heading up business development for staffing in high-population jobs.

Marc Wenzel, Ph.D. Joins Shaker Consulting Group

Shaker Consulting Group, the market leader in custom simulations for pre-employment testing is bolstering rapid business growth with the addition of assessment industry expert Marc Wenzel, Ph.D.  Wenzel’s previous experience in market development with Pan Testing and ThinkWise Inc. makes him a distinctive addition to our team,” said Shaker president Brian Stern, Ph.D..

“Marc has a truly unique depth of experience working with large companies to solve complex staffing challenges,” said Joseph P. Murphy, executive vice president at Shaker.  From his work with high-population jobs to assessing partners at Accenture and candidates for higher volume roles at talent leaders like P&G, and Dow Chemical, Marc brings a strong focus on rigor and HR Analytics which business leaders appreciate.  Marc has great capabilities to demonstrate how HR Analytics are tied to commercial outcomes through staffing process improvement.

Companies that hire 100’s or 1,000’s of people into one job require a specialized candidate evaluation solution.  Shaker’s core service offering, the Virtual Job Tryout®, deploys evidence-based management practices for staffing in high-population jobs.  The demand for these services at Shaker was up 30% in 2012.  The high return on investment (ROI) from these staffing process improvement initiatives has  fueled new client growth.  Equally notable, the continued year-over-year ROI has contributed to significant growth from existing clients as they expand their use of the Virtual Job Tryout into additional critical roles.

“I have had my eye on Shaker for over 10 years, and had the personal experience of installing the Virtual Job Tryout as a customer inside a large bank. There is really no one else like them in the assessment market.  Finding a company that can give relevant, rigorous talent data that business leaders can use along with the attention to the candidate experience is a rarity in our field.” said Marc. “Not surprisingly, Shaker has attracted a roster of world class clients who leverage the information to build a workforce that delivers superior results.  I am excited to be joining an organization with a brilliant solution for brand-conscious organizations seeking to deliver an exceptionally engaging candidate experience.

If you will be attending the SIOP 2013 Conference in Houston, stop at our booth #108 in the exhibit hall and congratulate Marc on his new position with our firm.

Alternatively, if you will be attending 2013 ERE Conference and Expo in San Diego, stop at our booth # 418 in the exhibit hall and congratulate Marc on his new position with our firm.

Marc will open a new office in Cincinnati OH, Shaker’s fifth location.

April 5, 2013

Practical Rigor – Evidence Supported Hiring Decisions

David Creelman of Creelman Research and I are pleased to announce the release of a new book. (see link below to receive a copy)

Practical Rigor: Evidence Based Management to Improve Hiring in High Population Jobs

How to Improve Hiring in High Population Jobs

Rigor in decision making is essential. Yet for reasons both good and otherwise, there is a big gap between how business professor’s think management decisions should be made and what happens in real life.

Employee selection is one of the rare areas where that chasm has been crossed. This is particularly the case for high population jobs where an organization is hiring hundreds of employees. Using multi-method assessment to evaluate candidates creates a data rich environment where statistical analysis and predictive modeling add rigor to decision making. This book zeros in on rigor in that kind of high volume selection.

Many organizations hire or engage specialists to solve complex measurement and analysis challenges.  This book touches on the specialist skills of industrial organizational psychology (IOP), and the use of selection science practices proven to deliver staffing process improvement.  Explore how you can reduce administrative burden to reduce time to hire, reduce staffing waste, and increase quality of hire.

Here are what a few people had to say about the book.

“Murphy and Creelman describe how to tee up and drive an evidence-based selection strategy straight down the fairway—while missing traditional staffing hazards or flirting with those intuitive out-of-bounds markers.”

Gerry Crispin

Chief Navigator, CareerXroads

“This savvy book drills down into the what, why and how of using evidence to hire the right people—and helps practitioners navigate the politics of evidence.”

Denise M. Rousseau, Ph. D.

H.J. Heinz II, Professor of Organizational Behavior and Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon University

“A clear, concise explanation of why gathering and analyzing data about candidates and employees pays off in higher quality work performance. The concept of “practical rigor” is useful and powerful, and should help to allay any fears of producing theoretical results that don’t work in practice.”

Kevin Wheeler

President, Global Learning Resources, Inc. & The Future of Talent Institute

To receive a free copy, follow this link and write PRACTICAL RIGOR in one of the text boxes.

March 25, 2013

Bob Dylan and the Candidate Experience Award

We began asking every candidate who completed one of our assessments what they thought about their experience around 15 years ago. It was pretty novel then. About seven years ago, I used a survey to ask companies if they were seeking candidate feedback in the application process. A very small percent of organization responded affirmatively. It was still pretty novel then too. However, we just need to listen to some old Bob Dylan – “Times they are a changin.” Increasingly, organizations are seeking data to deploy evidence-based management for staffing process improvement

Candidate Experience Award Council Member

A group of like-minded individuals (CandE Council), has come together to advance the quality of the candidate experience. The Talent Board was created to capture data, provide analysis and insight and support corporate initiatives for improving the candidate experience with an evidence-based management approach.

Now entering its third year, the Candidate Experience Award is gaining visibility and attracting more participants. We want you to participate – “Don’t Think Twice, Its Alright”. Click here to learn more and register for the 2013 program.

An often written about and frequently expressed concern is the lack of acknowledgment and engagement for candidates. Candidates flock to careers web pages responding to the message “I Want You”, but one common response is they feel like they have been left out on “Desolation Row”.

In an interview with Gerry Crispin he suggested companies define their candidate experience and then measure it to see of they are delivering on the candidate experience promise.  Well it might be a “Simple Twist of Fate”, that you can now do just that.

Candidates arrive at careers sites due to brand attraction. When they enter your experience it is important to“Handle With Care.”

Learn about your recruiting practices though self evaluation and the voice of your candidates. Participants get an opportunity to collect data from their candidates and learn from practices employed by other organizations. Armed with data participants can make choices and take actions to improve their candidate experience. And when that happens, we can all celebrate because we will know “Things Have Changed.”

After putting up with this article, you may be thinking of another great tune: “Idiot Wind.

For additional content on the candidate experience click here.’

Quality of Hire: Two Methods for HR Analytics

Quality of hire can be measured via two types of performance data.
Subjective: Ratings of observed behaviors, such as behaviorally anchored competency scales.
Objective: Performance outcomes captured in the form of numbers.

When sound data is used to document quality of hire, evidence-based management is being deployed for the business process called staffing.

Evidence of Quality of Hire

There is an underlying assumption with subjective measures that an individual rated higher on a valued behavior (job specific competency) is a more valuable employee. These are however, still opinions, and difficult to use in a calculation that documents value.

With objective measures, performance outcomes may be easily equated with dollar values, and thus contribute to a quantitative ROI analysis.

Some jobs do not have clear, specific performance metrics that are captured. Captured being the operative word.

Without data capture, there can be no analysis. Without analysis, no insights, and quality of hire remains elusive. As a practitioner, being well versed in methodology for HR analytics is important. If you are seeking assistance in this area, seek out an industrial organizational psychologist (IOP)

Quality, it has been said is determined by the customer. Who is the customer and what outcomes are important in talent acquisition?
If it is hiring manager and their opinion, a survey will work for QOH
If it is the hiring manager and their department production goals, then opinion may not be an adequate metric.

As an exercise, ask the hiring manager to produce a list of the objective performance metrics for the job. If there is enough people in the job to calculate a group average. (see more on performance variation here.) Quality of hire may then be viewed as new hire performance that lifts the average of the group. In accomplishing this you have delivered staffing process improvement

For more to think about, take a lesson from Lake Wobegon

January 10, 2013

NOHRC to Sponsor SC4K: Bring Shoes and Clothes!

Happy New Year HR practitioners and friends! There will be an excellent program for all NOHRC 2013 attendees!

NOHRC 2013



As a guest speaker, I am proud to announce that NOHRC has chosen another terrific organization to highlight at this year’s conference. Shoes and Clothes for Kids (SC4K) is the only non-profit organization in Greater Cleveland providing new shoes and clothes throughout the year to thousands of children in need. SC4K will be taking donations at the conference.

Hopefully, you will be able to attend and contribute to their mission with me. To learn more about Shoes and Clothes for Kids, visit their website at www.sc4k.org

In the meantime, check out these important conference-related links :
To view the conference schedule, click here.
To view speaker bios (including my own!), click here.
To view FAQs inspired by previous conferences, click here.

I look forward to seeing you there. And if it makes sense for your learning objectives, join my session on HR analytics and staffing process improvement Recruiting By the Numbers.

January 9, 2013

Sport Scouts Observer Performance, Corporate Recruiters Can Use Tryouts Too

Wendell Williams wrote an interesting article on ERE addressing seven common flaws in corporate recruiting practices. It presented a good sports recruiting and skill demonstration analogy.

Yes, recruiters are faced with the challenge of gaining insight to performance potential of someone they have never observed.

“HR recruiters in the corporate world don’t use tryouts, so they don’t really know whether candidates can do the job.”

Some organizations do.
The use of job-specific simulations, as a form of talent audit is a growing practice.
Organizations with high-population jobs find it easy to build a business case for the development and validation of simulations for pre-employment assessment of talent.
This in effect allows candidates to take elements of the job for a test-drive, thus producing a work sample that predicts on-the-job performance. In essence, they deliver a virtual job tryout.

Job Tryout - Can you cut stone?

In committing to the development of in-house, job-specific simulations, an organization resolves the seven counterproductive practices Wendell describes.

Companies who use simulations enjoy the same results of talent scouts in sports. They only invest the time to observe (screen/interview) those individuals who have produced evidence (stats) of their talent.

Companies using job-specific simulations have HR analytics to report a range of outcomes such as a 50% reduction in interview to hire ratios and consistently document the quality of hire as compared to the current workforce.

Readers interested in an overview of the technical merits of simulations for selection can read about a session from the 2012 Society of Industrial Organization Psychologists (SIOP) Conference Here

January 8, 2013

James H. Gilmore on The Candidate Experience

James H. Gilmore, co-founder of Strategic Horizons is a foremost authority on the nature of experience as a driver and differentiator in business. He has documented a broad range of examples of how experience provides competitive advantage in the market in his book: The Experience Economy. My research and writing on the candidate experience created a connection to James. We had the good fortune to meet and discuss our views on this important topic. Our conversation surfaced some thoughtful considerations for staffing process improvement through the lens of experience.

In the video below, James offers a variety of compelling factors to consider in what experience to deliver to the candidate in the recruiting process. Click PLAY to hear what he has to say. Then scroll down to explore his ideas in more detail.

Broadly, James offers four key points for consideration:
Time as currency – how is the time spent, who spends the most time?
Memory – what memories are created for all parties, how lasting are those memories?
Experience Stages – Attracting, Entering, During, Exiting, Extending
Bridge digital to physical – extend a tangible outcome to acknowledge the exchange

I conducted early research and participated in the development of the Candidate Experience Award surveys. The Talent Board now has two years of survey data from corporations and applicants that specifically address many elements of the candidate experience. James’ suggestions hit on several points which candidates state are important to them. I will expand on each point.

Time As Currency
Candidates invest a lot of time completing job applications. For those truly in need of a job, the act of applying can carry a note of desperation. The time spent is an investment of hope, anticipation, and optimism. What is their return on investment?

Every candidate who applies wants feedback. It can be as simple as acknowledgement that you received their data. Furthermore, they want to know if they are being considered, if someone has looked at their submission, and if they are qualified. They also want to know if they have been knocked out. Use your ATS to disposition them. One participant personally acknowledges every candidate that applies. In 2012 their candidate volume approached 50,000. They spend time making a personal touch with each candidate and view it as an extension of their brand. And they take their brand image very seriously.

Memory
This is a new factor to consider, and the Candidate Experience Award survey does not address this directly. However, candidates do indeed remember how they were treated, both well and poorly. Candidates indicate negative experience influence brand perception and impact the likelihood of referring other candidates. Positive experiences can be delivered to all applicants, and those successful in getting a job offer typically walk away with the best memory, but that is not universal. Candidates can still feel negative about the process in spite of getting a job.

Some organizations seek feedback from candidates at each step of the process. Each step delivers an experience which in turn creates a memory. What memory does your staffing process create?

Experience Stages
James shared a five stage experience model – Attracting, Entering, During, Exiting and Extending. These can be easily overlaid with most staffing processes.
Attracting – sourcing, inviting candidates to consider a career with your firm
Entering – the ATS, or summiting an application process
During – acknowledgement, screening, assessing, interviewing
Exiting – rejection, dispositioning, feedback
Extending – job offer, joining a talent community, post experience memory and engagement

Each of these process stages can be owned by different constituents and vary widely in how the candidate responds. One of the biggest requests from candidates is to know where they stand. Each of these stages is an opportunity to communicate, confirm and manage expectations. Firms designated as delivering and outstanding experience manage the communication well at all stages of the process.

Bridge Digital to Physical
With 100 to 1 applicant to hire ratios, it may not be realistic to make a physical connection to each individual. One of the Candidate Experience Award winners did give an on-line game token to all of their candidates. However, they had their brand embedded in the game. This served as two value points in the overall experience – extend the brand and continue to communicate to the candidate.

There can be creative and low cost ways to connect with your candidates. Put your thinking cap on and see what you come up with.

James Gilmore will be speaking on HR and the Experience Economy at the January 17, 2013 meeting of NOHRPS. Click here for more details.

January 3, 2013

Don’t Post a Job, Advertise Respect – Where Does Your Candidate Experience Begin?

Peter Weddle, wrote a compelling newsletter January 3rd, 2013.

Part two of this edition focuses on the nature of the job posting as a communication medium to enhance the Candidate Experience. Peter’s suggestion is just one more example of great practices which contribute to staffing process improvement. With Peter’s permission, the article is provided below.

Peter also mentions the recent focus on the candidate experience. One organization in particular that has raised the visibility on the candidate experience is the Talent Board and their Candidate Experience Award. The list of the 2012 award winners can be found here. A white paper with highlights from the 2012 submission and evaluation process will be released in late January 2013. Look back here for a link to the report.

Candidate Experience Award

Don’t Post a Job, Advertise Respect

Job postings are now routinely used on both job boards and social media sites. These online communications remain the most widespread method of candidate sourcing, yet are disparaged and ignored at almost every recruitment conference. Why? Because recruiters intuitively grasp the cost-benefit advantage of job postings, but all too often don’t grab hold of their power. They use job postings to describe a job, when they would be better served by delivering respect.

There’s been much written and spoken over the past couple of years about the importance of optimizing the candidate experience. In a highly competitive recruiting market, top performers will always gravitate to where they are treated best. As a consequence, the organization which gives candidates a distinctive and memorable experience will have a formidable advantage in the War for Talent.

That experience is typically defined as what happens to a candidate while they are passing through an organization’s recruiting process. For the candidate, however, the experience starts well before that point. It begins when they first encounter an employment opportunity. That interaction sets the tone for everything else that happens between the organization and the candidate.

Thanks to their heritage in print publications, job postings have traditionally been viewed as advertisements or announcements. Indeed, all too often, job postings are simply classified ad copy or position descriptions re-purposed online. They sell or inform, but they do not engage the candidate. They generate applications from active job seekers, but have little or no impact on the passive prospects who make up the majority of the workforce.

What’s the best way for your organization to engage that passive population? Publish job postings that deliver respect. Use word choice and content to signal to candidates that you recognize and value their talent.

A Respectful Job Posting

There are many facets to a “respectful job posting,” but the following four are among the most important.

Number 1. Use vocabulary that corresponds to the reader’s self image. Top performers never think of themselves as a supplicant for work (even when they are in transition) and they seldom have a resume, so engage them by using more respectful terms and phrases. Address them as a “candidate” or “prospect” rather than as a “job seeker” and ask them to submit “an application” rather than “a resume.”

Number 2. Tell the reader how long it will take to complete the application. Top performers are almost always employed and thus consider their time to be quite valuable, so engage them by acknowledging and showing your respect for that point of view. Indicate how much time they will have to invest to apply for your opening and whether they must complete the application in a single sitting or can do so over several periods of time.

Number 3. Give the reader the information that’s important to them. Top performers don’t care about an opening’s requirements and responsibilities, so engage them by respecting their wishes and telling them what’s in it for them. Describe what they will get to do, learn and accomplish in your organization and its opening and with whom they will get to work and how they will be recognized for their contribution.

Number 4. Show the reader that your organization is courteous. Top performers don’t like being left in the dark or ignored when they apply for an opening, so engage them by treating them as politely as you would a guest. State that your organization will acknowledge the receipt of their application and provide the email address from which it will arrive so they can ensure it doesn’t get caught in their spam filter.

A job posting works best when it operates as a talent engagement platform rather than as an advertisement or announcement. And, engagement is best achieved with a posting that uses both vocabulary and content to convey an organization’s respect for the reader.

Thanks for reading,

Peter

Visit Peter at Weddles

Thanks for sharing Peter. Keep up the advocacy for a positive and respectful candidate experience.

RSS Feed LinkedIn