Shaker Consulting Group Logo Virtual Job Tryout Logo

Posts Tagged ‘ATS’

February 22, 2012

Bruce Ferguson of iHire on the Candidate Experience

Bruce Ferguson of iHire sheds an expanded view of how to deal with rejection as part of the candidate experience.  He offers suggestions on how to think about the talent pipeline as community, thus his focus is not how to reject, but how to connect.  Click PLAY, and then scroll down to discover more.

Bruce begins by asking us to define the issue.  You can ask “How do I reject the 99%?” and get some clear methods to send a message stating you did not get the job.   However, with the question “How can I build a valuable community?” you get a very different set of answers.  Here are the four themes Bruce invites us to explore.

  1. Rethink your talent pipeline – get out of the transaction mindset
  2. Deploy community building resources – share information
  3. Think long-term relationship – consider fit for the future
  4. Use incentives to convert candidates to sourcers

Rethink your talent pipeline – get out of the transaction mindset

Just-in-time was an inventory management strategy to reduce assets in the distribution channel.  Just-in-time sourcing puts candidate assets into the talent distribution channel much like the proverbial pig in the python.  In hard-goods distribution channel, the feeding is transitioned to small bites.  In recruiting, we not only still serve pig-sized servings, the pig is never digested.  Applicant tracking systems (ATS) are chock-full of every candidate that ever applied.

For some reason, fresh candidates must seem better.  Bruce suggests we think about, and actively engage the inventory in our ATS.  Look back, look inside and label the best candidates that did not get hired.  Keep in contact with them.

Deploy community building resources – share information

The web has proliferated interactive community building resources. Some are extremely simple.  Create an invitation only group on LinkedIn.  Use a communication strategy to foster dialogue, share information about the firm and the future.  Create a candidate experience that goes beyond the resume’ capture.

Think long-term relationship – consider fit for the future

I do not recruit, but I do refer.

A friend called with a ‘think about this’ sourcing request.  About a week later, a young man came to mind that was a client some 20 year previous. It was pre-personal digital assistant/smart phone.  I had an old paper-based phone number in my drawer.  I called and to my surprise, he answered, we spoke, and eventually he took the job in play at that time.

The funny part was that he left the firm where I had his phone number, came back years later and got the same number.  I reconnected by chance.  These days, it would have been easy to keep him in my community.  In filling some jobs you get to meet bonus candidates, those you don’t hire at that time, but just might later.  Create some ties that bind.  Let them know you want to keep the relationship active.  Then live the promise.  That will change the candidate experience for those individuals and enhance your down-stream recruiting success.

Use incentives to convert candidates to source

I have to admit, this one scares me a bit.  Incentives can create unique behaviors.  Getting the right behavior is essential.

We did some quality of referral and quality of hire analysis.  Getting referrals from high performing individuals proved to be a winning formula.  Referrals from candidates with low scores on their pre-employment test tended to also perform marginally on their assessment.  The moral is more than be careful what you ask for.  It expands to Be careful whom you ask for what.  We also perform HR Analytics that examine yield and quality of hire by source.  You may find that of interest as you examine social media links and relationships  of candidates.

The nature of your candidate experience has a lot to do with how actively a candidate will refer others.  The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is often looked to as an indicator of a highly regarded experience.

Every candidate that completes a Virtual Job Tryout is asked for feedback on the experience.  Over 90% state they will refer others to apply, based upon the nature of their candidate experience.

So getting candidates to source for you may not take incentives, just a great candidate experience.  A candidate experience that extends and enhances your brand.

For more information on this topic, read the multi-author Candidate Experience Monograph

Take note of the 2012 Candidate Experience Award.  Application information can be obtained here.

Thanks to Bruce for giving us some food for thought.

June 25, 2010

Disruptive Recruiting and Pre-Employment Assessments

Kevin Wheeler in his June 17 ERE article discusses Disruptive Recruiting and asks us to rethink recruiting.  Specifically he suggests automation and process simplification, among others.  I had an opportunity to ask Kevin about improving the candidate experience at ERE, where he suggested we make it easy to apply.  We may have made it too easy to apply. While valued from the candidate perspective, making it too easy to apply creates severe unintended consequences for the company and the recruiters.

A few years ago I did a survey, asking if the candidate experience was measured or evaluated.  The vast majority of companies (86%) DO NOT ask candidates for feedback about their on-line employment experience.  In spite of a lack of candidate feedback, a surprisingly large group, (29%) believe their candidate experience is so positive that it creates referrals and viral marketing.  During my presentation at the 2010 Staffing Management Conference, only 3% of participants stated they were evaluating the candidate experience.  The trend is down, and the quality of the experience is vastly unknown.  Disruption is needed indeed.

Candidate use “Spray and Pray” resume distribution.  Companies use social media, job preview videos that are more hype than help and create viral attraction that can clog the ATS or CRM pipeline with numbers of candidates that make the personal touch un-scalable.

There is a maddening belief that more is better.  And to a degree, there is truth to that.  However, without decision science, some form of pre-employment assessment, more is just a recruiting nightmare and it creates a challenge to workload management not to mention a greater number of candidates that may be disappointed by lack of personal touch.

When an individual is in the job market, each employer touch point – human, digital or otherwise is part of your brand experience.  With some companies experiencing a 50:1, or even 500;1 applicant to hire ratios, coupled with high requisition loads, the brand positive nature of the digital experience must be considered.  Rest assured, if they applied with you, they applied with your competitor.  The digital experience matters even more, largely due to the fact that this might be their only touch point. The candidates will see the difference, if there is a difference to see.

Kevin also suggests recruiting build talent communities.  Candidates are decision makers. The on-line experience should keep that in mind.

Based upon your on-line experience, candidates decide if they:
Like your company,
Have learned enough to want to apply
Feel better about your brand as a result of applying
Are inclined to speak favorably about your company
Will refer others, based upon their initial experience
Will join your talent community

Read some of these candidate testimonials and see what an engaging and informative pre-employment assessment can do to contribute to a positive candidate experience, even when your team is faced with large applicant to hire ratios and high requisition work loads.  Then think about just how disruptive you need to be.

March 16, 2010

What’s Your Recruiting Value Proposition?

Kevin Wheeler of Global Learning Resources and The Future of Talent wrote on ERE.net last week asking whether corporate recruiting was doomed. Kevin, your thoughtful consideration of the talent space always asks us to step back and ponder. Thank you.

Staffing is a process with yields to manage. Creating and delivering on a recruiting/talent management value proposition is what differentiates the highly effective from less effective practitioners. The ability to produce measures of meaning is lacking, and as such, those without measurements are more in jeopardy. At the heart of any talent process should be a sound measurement system.

Much is written and the dialogue fierce at times on the sourcing side and the on-boarding side of the talent pipeline. However, the “Apply Now” button candidate experience and value of data mining their responses is largely ignored. The ATS experience is underperforming. New technology is needed.

John Sumser is correct in his comment on Kevin’s article, engaging simulations are an emerging frontier. In fact, the US Merit Protection System just submitted a paper to President Obama citing the value and need for simulations as pre-employment testing for government jobs. Email me for a copy.

Candidates are demanding a more robust and meaningful online experience. They create viral marketing for the good and bad on-line experience. In terms of talent attraction and decision quality, those with the best “Apply Now” button will win.

Forget all your sourcing for a minute and go apply for a job at your company. Drink in what happens after you hit the “Apply Now” button. Ask yourself, how would that resonate with an active candidate, much less a passive candidate?

Does your candidate experience drive your recruiting value proposition? Check out Virtual Job Tryout. Or contact us today. We’d love to hear from you.

RSS Feed LinkedIn